Mathematicians
Abraham de Moivre
duh-MWAHV-ruh
Early Modern
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
French-born mathematician who spent nearly his whole working life in England as a Huguenot Protestant refugee, having fled France after the 1685 revocation of the Edict of Nantes. Despite election as a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1697 and friendships with Isaac Newton and Edmond Halley, he was never given a paid academic position in England and supported himself largely by tutoring and by consulting on gambling and annuity problems. His 1718 book The Doctrine of Chances was the first systematic textbook on probability theory. In a 1733 pamphlet he derived the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial, the first appearance of what later became known as the central limit theorem, for the special case of repeated fair-coin-type trials; the general theorem was not proved until Laplace and, fully rigorously, Lyapunov took it up nearly a century and two centuries later. He is also credited with de Moivre's formula linking complex numbers and trigonometry.
Facts
BirthplaceVitry-le-Francois, Champagne, France 1 Nationality / CultureFrench (Huguenot refugee, resident in England from 1688) 1 Defining ContributionProved the first special case of the central limit theorem (1733), the normal approximation to the binomial distribution; de Moivre's formula for complex numbers. 2 Notable WorkThe Doctrine of Chances (1718) 1 AwardFellow of the Royal Society (1697) 1 Learn More
The Refugee Who Counted the Odds
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
Abraham de Moivre never held a university chair. He spent nearly seventy years in England as a Huguenot exile, tutoring students in mathematics for a living and, in the coffeehouses of London, consulting for gamblers who wanted to know their real odds. It is a strange origin story for a foundational result in statistics, but it is the true one: the normal distribution, the bell curve that today underlies everything from standardized testing to manufacturing quality control, first appears in a 1733 pamphlet de Moivre wrote to answer exactly that kind of practical question, working out how a binomial distribution, the outcome of many independent coin-flip-like trials, behaves as the number of trials grows large. He proved only the special, symmetric case; it would take Laplace, working from the other end of the eighteenth century, and then Lyapunov, in 1901, to state and prove the theorem in the full generality now taught as the central limit theorem. De Moivre's own name survives elsewhere too, in de Moivre's formula linking the powers of complex numbers to trigonometry, a small piece of algebra every later mathematician has used without necessarily knowing whose it was. He died, according to a story his own contemporaries told about him, on the exact day he had calculated his sleep would finally reach twenty-four hours a night. Whether or not that reasoning is exactly true, the coincidence of the date is not in dispute.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Proofs Credited
Proved the 1733 special case (normal approximation to the binomial); Laplace generalized it in 1810 and Lyapunov gave the first fully rigorous general conditions in 1901.
Sources
Frequently Asked Questions
Did Abraham de Moivre really predict the day of his own death?
A widely repeated contemporary anecdote says so; the death date itself is well documented, the exact reasoning less certain.
The story, recounted in his contemporaries' accounts and repeated in most modern biographies, is that in old age de Moivre noticed he was sleeping about fifteen minutes longer each night and extrapolated the arithmetic progression to find the date on which it would reach twenty-four hours; he is said to have died on that date, 27 November 1754. The anecdote is well attested as a story that circulated during and shortly after his life, though some historians treat the precise mechanism as an embellishment rather than a literal account of his reasoning. What is not in dispute is the date of death itself.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.